Back to Explorer

Best Practices for Selecting a Predicate Device to Support a Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission: Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

DraftCenter for Devices and Radiological Health Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research09/07/2023

Description

FDA is issuing this draft guidance to provide our current thinking on the use of best practices in selecting a predicate device in 510(k) submissions to enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) Program. FDA developed this draft guidance in response to public feedback, and to continue to modernize the framework for 510(k) review. The recommendations in this draft guidance propose factors for consideration as best practices for choosing a predicate device that focus on characteristics of the predicate, including selecting a predicate device that was cleared using well-established methods, meets or exceeds expected safety and performance, is without unmitigated use-related or design-related safety issues, and is without an associated design-related recall. FDA believes use of these best practices will encourage the evolution of safer and more effective medical devices in the 510(k) Program over time.

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

7
Implant

Devices requiring pyrogenicity and implantation testing

Inter-vertebral fusion device

Specific device type used in Example 3

Bone Sonometer

Specific device type used in Example 2

Predicate Device

A legally marketed device used as a point of comparison for a 510(k) submission

Class II Device

Devices subject to section 522 postmarket surveillance orders; devices subject to postmarket surveillance orders

Infusion Pump

Example of a device requiring predicate selection

Duodenoscope

Example of a device with reprocessing safety signals

Stakeholders

2
Submitter

The entity providing information for the AFIC process.

Manufacturer

Entity responsible for submitting NDINs

Regulatory Context

Attributes

3
Intended Use

Evidence of a new intended use based on communications

Safety profile

The established safety history of a device based on market duration

Technological Characteristics

materials, design, and energy source of the device

Identified Hazards

Hazards

3
Cybersecurity

Risk of device functionality being compromised

Use-related safety issues

Safety concerns arising from how the device is used

Emerging Signal

New information about a device supporting a new causal association with adverse events

Related CFR Sections (3)

Related Warning Letters (10)

  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Envoy Medical Inc.

    2025-12-09
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Hong Qiangxing Shenzhen Electronics Limited

    2025-11-25
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Spectra Therapy, LLC

    2025-08-12
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Mectronic Medicale S.R.L.

    2025-08-05
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Aju Pharm Co., Ltd.

    2025-06-24
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Sedecal S.A.

    2025-05-27
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    NeuroSync, Inc.

    2025-05-20
  • Noah Medical Corporation

    2025-04-22
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    EpiCare Acquisitions, LLC

    2025-04-08
  • Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE)/Premarket Approval Application (PMA) Adulterated Device

    Exer Labs, Inc.

    2025-03-25

See Also (8)