Back to Explorer

Significant Risk and Nonsignificant Risk Medical Device Studies: Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

FinalOffice of the Commissioner,Office of Clinical Policy and Programs,Office of Clinical Policy,Office of Good Clinical Practice Center for Devices and Radiological Health01/01/2006

Description

This guidance is intended to provide advice to sponsors, clinical investigators, and institutional review boards (IRBs) on how to determine the differences between significant risk and nonsignificant risk medical device studies.  This document supersedesSignificant Risk and Nonsignificant Risk Medical Device Studies(September 1998) Office of Health Affairs, Food and Drug Administration.  This document was revised to update the list of examples of significant and nonsignificant risk devices, to clarify the IRB’s responsibilities when making the risk determination for investigational medical devices, and to make the guidance consistent with the Agency’s good guidance practices regulations (21 CFR 10.115).

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

8
Significant Risk Device

Devices requiring full IDE submission

Combination Product

Products combining drug, device, or biological constituents; Generally recommended for Enhanced Documentation; Requires 14971-based framework incorporating ICH Q9; A drug-device combination where the device constituent part detects ingestion.

Nonsignificant Risk Device

Devices subject to abbreviated IDE requirements

Implant

Devices requiring pyrogenicity and implantation testing

extended wear contact lens

Categorized as a Significant Risk device

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Devices

Example of a Nonsignificant Risk device within FDA parameters

Surgical Lasers

Categorized as a Significant Risk device

Significant Risk Medical Device

medical devices addressed by this guidance are generally considered significant risk

Stakeholders

4
Sponsor

Entity responsible for submitting applications under section 524B

Institutional Review Board

Governs top dose in clinical studies

Clinical Investigator

Veterinarian responsible for selecting anesthetic regimens and conducting field studies

IRB

Institutional Review Board providing study approvals

Regulatory Context

Attributes

1
Minimal Risk

Risk level for exception from informed consent

Related CFR Sections (7)

Related Warning Letters (10)

  • Clinical Investigator

    Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.

    2025-09-09
  • Clinical Investigator

    Mark J. Savant, M.D

    2025-07-15
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    United Health Products, Inc.

    2025-05-20
  • Clinical Investigator

    Americo F. Padilla, M.D.

    2025-03-25
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Armstrong County Memorial Hospital

    2024-11-05
  • Clinical Investigator

    Namita A. Goyal, M.D.

    2024-10-22
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Louisiana State University Health Science Center IRB

    2024-10-08
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/IRB

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

    2024-07-16
  • Clinical Investigator (Sponsor)

    Angela D. Ritter, M.D.

    2024-06-18
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    New York State Psychiatric Institute IRB

    2024-03-26

See Also (8)