Back to Explorer

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims: Guidance for Industry

FinalCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research Center for Devices and Radiological Health Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research12/09/2009

Description

This guidance describes how the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews and evaluates existing, modified, or newly created patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used to support claims in approved medical product labeling. A PRO instrument (i.e., a questionnaire plus the information and documentation that support its use) is a means to capture PRO data used to measure treatment benefit or risk in medical product clinical trials. This guidance does not address the use of PRO instruments for purposes beyond evaluation of claims made about a medical product in labeling. This guidance also does not address disease-specific issues. Guidance on clinical trial endpoints for specific diseases can be found on various FDA Web sites.

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

3
PRO instruments

Patient-Reported Outcome instruments used in medical product development.; application of PRO instruments to multiple cultures or languages; Incorporating PRO instruments as clinical trial endpoint measures.; Instruments used to support labeling claims

Patient-reported outcome

A measurement based on a report that comes directly from the patient about the status of a health condition.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims

Stakeholders

6
Sponsor

Entity responsible for submitting applications under section 524B

Clinical investigators

Source of safety information in clinical trials

FDA investigator

HHS officer or employee who collects an official sample

Clinical Investigator

Veterinarian responsible for selecting anesthetic regimens and conducting field studies

Pediatric Patients

Dosage recommendations for pediatric subpopulations

Sponsors

Assist sponsors in the nonclinical evaluation

Regulatory Context

Attributes

10
Recall Period

A characteristic of PRO instruments reviewed by the FDA.; The time period patients are asked to remember when responding to a PRO instrument.; The period of time patients are asked to consider in responding to a PRO item.; A modification to the original instrument that requires rationale

Treatment benefit

The effect of treatment on how a patient survives, feels, or functions.

Scale

Manufacturing scale defined as 200 kg

Saturation

The point when no new relevant or important information emerges in qualitative research

Measurement properties

Attributes relevant to the application of a PRO instrument including content validity and reliability.

Type I error rate

Statistical parameter requiring strong control when testing multiple endpoints

Audit trail

The data maintained by the clinical investigator should include an audit trail.

Electronic Audit Trail

without an electronic audit trail that documents all changes to the data

Patient preference ratings

used to weight items or domains

Reliability

reliability includes accuracy, completeness, and traceability

Identified Hazards

Hazards

2
Respondent burden

Undue physical, emotional, or cognitive strain on patients; Methods of missing data imputation should take the patient population, disease progression, and respondent burden into account.

Data corruption

risk of data corruption or loss during the trial

Related CFR Sections (5)

Related Warning Letters (6)

  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program

    Amy Lightner, MD

    2025-06-03
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Misbranded

    Wello Inc.

    2023-11-14
  • CGMP/Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)/Adulterated

    Fagron Group B.V.

    2022-06-28
  • CGMP/Dietary Supplement/Adulterated/Misbranded

    Hawaii Pharm LLC

    2020-05-05
  • Investigational Device Exemptions (Clinical Investigator)

    Kennedy, Philip R.

    2020-04-07
  • Clinical Investigator

    James R. Corbett, M.D.

    2020-03-10

See Also (8)