Back to Explorer

Guidance Document for the Preparation of IDEs for Spinal Systems - Guidance for Industry and/or FDA Staff

FinalCenter for Devices and Radiological Health01/12/2000

Description

This document supersedes document the preliminary background document for the future development of a spinal IDE guidance dated 8/26/98.

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

7
Spinal Systems

The primary product category covered by this guidance; Guidance Document for the Preparation of IDEs for Spinal Systems; The subject of the guidance document.; Guidance for the Preparation of IDEs for Spinal Systems; unknown long term device performance of some types of spinal systems; The specific device category covered by the IDE guidance

Vertebral body replacement devices

Devices where vertebral height assessment is applicable instead of disc height; treatment of spinal tumors

Significant risk devices

FDA believes guidewires addressed by this guidance are significant risk devices

Pedicle screw systems

Specific type of spinal system; brief summary may be sufficient for spinal system types such as pedicle screw systems; Example of system intended for fusion

Intervertebral body fusion devices

Specific type of spinal system such as cages; new designs of devices such as intervertebral body fusion devices; Example of system intended for fusion

Intervertebral body fusion device

Example of an investigational device for lumbar DDD.

Vertebral body replacement

Device used for patients with spinal tumors.

Stakeholders

3
sponsor

responsible for justifying omission of studies

Investigator

Responsible for qualifications, training, and trial conduct; Individual responsible for trial conduct and data governance at a site.; May delegate tasks but retains overall responsibility; Person responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at a trial site; Responsible for trial conduct and participant safety; Responsible for trial conduct, data integrity, and investigational product management.; Individual responsible for trial conduct at a site and informing the institution.; maintaining

Institutional review board

approval required to commence a clinical study

Regulatory Context

Attributes

6
Significant risk

Classification of atherectomy devices for clinical trials

Biocompatibility

impact the biocompatibility of the device

Study success

used to determine the safety and effectiveness between the investigational and control study groups

Patient success

used to assess the success rate of an individual patient within a study group

Disc height assessment

Secondary evaluation parameter for spinal studies

Least burdensome

FDA requirement for protocol development.

Identified Hazards

Hazards

3
Systemic infection

A safety concern listed in exclusion criteria.

Pyrogenicity

Risk of febrile reaction

Osteoporosis

Condition where spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated.

Related CFR Sections (9)

Related Warning Letters (10)

  • Clinical Investigator

    Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.

    2025-09-09
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies

    CCIC Huatongwei International Inspection Co., Ltd.

    2025-08-26
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies

    Jiangsu Kerbio Medical Technology Group Co.

    2025-08-26
  • Clinical Investigator

    Mark J. Savant, M.D

    2025-07-15
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    United Health Products, Inc.

    2025-05-20
  • Clinical Investigator

    Americo F. Padilla, M.D.

    2025-03-25
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Armstrong County Memorial Hospital

    2024-11-05
  • Clinical Investigator

    Namita A. Goyal, M.D.

    2024-10-22
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Louisiana State University Health Science Center IRB

    2024-10-08
  • Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE)/Premarket Approval Application (PMA)

    Mid-Link Testing Company, Ltd

    2024-09-11

See Also (8)