Back to Explorer

The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

FinalCenter for Devices and Radiological Health07/28/2014

Description

FDA developedthis documentto provide guidance to industry and FDA staff about current review practices for premarket notification (510(k)) submissions. The intent of this guidance is to identify, explain, and clarify each of the critical decision points in the decision-making process FDA uses to determine substantial equivalence. This guidance is not intended to implement significant policy changes to the current 510(k) review process. Rather, the intent of this guidance is to enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) program by describing in greater detail the regulatory framework, policies, and practices underlying FDA’s 510(k) review.

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

10
Class I

General manual surgical instruments exempt from 510(k)

Therapeutic devices

Eligible when disease affects not more than 8,000 individuals/year

Diagnostic devices

Eligible based on number of individuals subjected to diagnosis

In vitro diagnostic devices

IVDs mentioned regarding clinical decision-making impact

Class II

The devices that are the subject of this guidance are Class II non-spinal metallic bone screws and washers

Class III

Class III subject to the 510(k) or PMA requirements

Class I Device

Low risk medical devices

Class II Device

Devices subject to section 522 postmarket surveillance orders; devices subject to postmarket surveillance orders

Class III Device

Generally recommended for Enhanced Documentation; Regulatory classification mentioned for implantable sensors and HPV tests; Mentioned in the context of an in vitro nucleic acid test for CMV DNA.

Combination Product

Products combining drug, device, or biological constituents; Generally recommended for Enhanced Documentation; Requires 14971-based framework incorporating ICH Q9; A drug-device combination where the device constituent part detects ingestion.

Stakeholders

1
Manufacturer

Entity responsible for submitting NDINs

Regulatory Context

Attributes

5
Intended Use

Evidence of a new intended use based on communications

Major level of concern

The software for this device was considered as a major level of concern

Indications for Use

conformity with an FDA-recognized standard can help demonstrate that an NGS-based test developer has performed the activities necessary to identify the indications for use; number and types of samples used in the study should be statistically justified for the test’s indications for use; If a modification expands the indications for use beyond aiding in the diagnosis of symptomatic individuals; Acceptable performance levels depend on these

Technological Characteristics

materials, design, and energy source of the device

Substantial Equivalence

Standard for 510(k) clearance

Identified Hazards

Hazards

1
Iatrogenic heart block

risk associated with complex ablation lesion sets

Related CFR Sections (7)

Related Warning Letters (10)

  • Clinical Investigator

    Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.

    2025-09-09
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies

    CCIC Huatongwei International Inspection Co., Ltd.

    2025-08-26
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies

    Jiangsu Kerbio Medical Technology Group Co.

    2025-08-26
  • Clinical Investigator

    Mark J. Savant, M.D

    2025-07-15
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    United Health Products, Inc.

    2025-05-20
  • Clinical Investigator

    Americo F. Padilla, M.D.

    2025-03-25
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Armstrong County Memorial Hospital

    2024-11-05
  • Clinical Investigator

    Namita A. Goyal, M.D.

    2024-10-22
  • Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    Louisiana State University Health Science Center IRB

    2024-10-08
  • Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE)/Premarket Approval Application (PMA)

    Mid-Link Testing Company, Ltd

    2024-09-11

See Also (8)

The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff | Guideline Explorer | BioRegHub