Back to Explorer

The Use of Clinical Holds Following Clinical Investigator Misconduct: Guidance for Industry and Clinical Investigators

FinalCenter for Devices and Radiological Health Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research09/02/2004

Description

This guidance provides information on one use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of its authority to impose a clinical hold on a study or study site if FDA finds that human subjects are or would be exposed to an unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury. Specifically, this guidance describes circumstances in which FDA may impose a clinical hold based on credible evidence that a clinical investigator conducting the study has committed serious violations of FDA regulations on clinical trials of human drugs and biologics, including 21 CFR Parts 312, 50, and 56, or has submitted false information to FDA or the sponsor in any required report. FDA may consider imposing a clinical hold in these situations where necessary to protect human subjects in the study from an unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury. Such a clinical hold may be imposed on the study in which the misconduct occurred or on other studies of drugs or biological products in which the clinical investigator is directly involved or proposed to be involved. Although FDA has authority to take various enforcement actions against a clinical investigator who commits serious violations of FDA regulations, these actions may not be completed swiftly enough to protect human subjects who may be at risk in ongoing studies conducted by the investigator. Where the investigator's misconduct appears to pose an ongoing threat to the safety and welfare of such subjects, imposition of a full or partial clinical hold on ongoing or proposed studies of human drugs or biological products may be appropriate. See 21 CFR 312.42(b)(1)(i), 312.42(b)(2)(i), 312.42(b)(3)(iii), and 312.42(b)(4)(i). This guidance does not address other circumstances in which FDA may impose a clinical hold if FDA finds that human subjects are or would be exposed to an unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury, including when there is no evidence of clinical investigator misconduct or a serious regulatory viol

Scope & Applicability

Stakeholders

5
Clinical Investigator

Veterinarian responsible for selecting anesthetic regimens and conducting field studies

Institutional Review Board

Governs top dose in clinical studies

Sponsor

Entity responsible for submitting applications under section 524B

IRB

Institutional Review Board providing study approvals

sponsor-investigator

individual who both initiates and conducts a clinical investigation

Identified Hazards

Hazards

1
Unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury

Criteria for imposing a clinical hold; Primary criteria for imposing a clinical hold; criteria for maintaining or lifting a clinical hold

Related CFR Sections (8)

Related Warning Letters (10)

  • In Vivo Bioavailability-Bioequivalence Studies – Clinical

    Maria A. Carballosa, M.D.

    2025-12-23
  • Unapproved New Drug/Unlicensed Biological Product/Biologics License Application (BLA)

    Celularity, Inc

    2025-12-09
  • Sponsor/Investigator

    Verdure Sciences, Inc.

    2025-11-18
  • Clinical Investigator (Sponsor)

    Pamela K. Den Besten, DDS, MS

    2025-09-30
  • Clinical Investigator/Sponsor

    Ralph A. DeFronzo, M.D.

    2025-09-23
  • Clinical Investigator

    Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.

    2025-09-09
  • Clinical Investigator

    Mark J. Savant, M.D

    2025-07-15
  • Clinical Investigator

    Peter Michael, M.D.

    2025-07-01
  • Clinical Investigator (Sponsor)

    American Behavioral Research Institute, LLC

    2025-06-10
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program

    Amy Lightner, MD

    2025-06-03

See Also (8)

The Use of Clinical Holds Following Clinical Investigator Misconduct: Guidance for Industry and Clinical Investigators | Guideline Explorer | BioRegHub