Description
This guidance addresses FDA’s current thinking regarding clinical development programs and trial designs for drugs to support an indication for the treatment of one or more dystrophinopathies: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and related dystrophinopathies including Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), DMD-associated dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and symptomatic carrier states in females. The most prominent pathology in dystrophinopathies is degeneration of skeletal and cardiac muscle leading to progressive loss of muscle function, respiratory and cardiac failure, and premature death. This guidance does not address the development of drugs to treat secondary complications of muscle degeneration in dystrophinopathies (e.g., drugs specifically for heart failure or pulmonary infections).
Key Topics
Terms and concepts identified from this document
Scope & Applicability
Product Classes
3Clinical investigations of drugs, including human drugs and biological products
Device protocols excluded from SPA
FDA could approve a drug for dystrophinopathies if a specific beneficial effect on the nervous system were demonstrated
Stakeholders
2Assist sponsors in the nonclinical evaluation
Entity responsible for submitting applications under section 524B
Regulatory Context
Regulatory Activities
2Pathway for drugs and biologics for serious conditions; Regulatory pathway supported by surrogate or intermediate endpoints; Regulatory pathway based on surrogate or intermediate endpoints; Pathway for products based on surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoints
Confirmatory studies intended to provide an adequate basis for approval
Document Types
1Cybersecurity information should be included in device labeling
Attributes
3Supported by data to show the test performs as intended.
Considerations for the overall assessment of the drug's profile.
Important baseline and prognostic variable for matching control groups.
Technical Details
Substances
3genetic mutations in the dystrophin gene that decrease the amount of dystrophin protein
Results involving biomarkers collected in the studies for efficacy and safety
Immune responses to dystrophin are adverse events of special interest.; Dystrophin is expressed in the brain
Testing Methods
10Most efficient way to demonstrate efficacy.
Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide safety
Nonclinical toxicity testing in young animals
consider the use of other biomarkers, such as those measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Examples of COAs including work productivity
Baseline laboratory assessment for patient enrollment.
Measurement of physical function
shorter versions such as the 2-minute walk test
As with myometry, sponsors should support the clinical meaningfulness
Method for measuring ejection fraction
Processes
4Trials should include assessment of PK and the relationship between drug exposure and virologic success.
Use of inclusion criteria to select patients with characteristics that predict rapid decline.
Direct therapy to patients with a particular disease characteristic.
increased through stratified randomization based on one or more prognostic factors
Clinical Concepts
10most common and generally most severe dystrophinopathy; Serious and life-threatening nature of DMD.; serious and life-threatening nature of diseases such as DMD; Document title and primary disease focus
Expected lack of effectiveness in certain subpopulations
Biomarkers collected in the studies for efficacy
sponsors analyze the primary and secondary endpoints as continuous or ordinal variables.
Related disease states discussed in the guidance
Evidence of effectiveness in chronic heart failure has traditionally relied on randomized trials
characterized by wide interpatient variability in severity
caused by dystrophin mutations that primarily affect cardiac muscle
female carriers of dystrophin mutations experience muscle degeneration
Specific adverse events requiring justification in Section 9.2.4; Events of scientific and medical concern relative to the trial intervention.; Safety outcomes to be analyzed in the protocol
Identified Hazards
Hazards
2Concern for drugs that increase physiological stress on the heart.
Issues that provide arguments against a broader patient population approval
ICH References (2)
Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials; Discourages deterministic procedures due to high risk of bias; Notes that the use of Bayesian methods in clinical trials may be considered.
Choice of Control Group in Clinical Trials.
Related CFR Sections (4)
- 21CFR312.42§ 312.42 Clinical holds and requests for modification.
(a) General. A clinical hold is an order issued by FDA to the sponsor to delay a proposed clinical investigation or to suspend an ongoing investigation. The clinical hold order may apply to one or more of the investigations covered by an IND. When a proposed study is placed on clinical hold, subjectRead full regulation →
- 21CFR312.80§ 312.80 Purpose.
The purpose of this section is to establish procedures designed to expedite the development, evaluation, and marketing of new therapies intended to treat persons with life-threatening and severely-debilitating illnesses, especially where no satisfactory alternative therapy exists. As stated § 314.10Read full regulation →
- 21CFR314.125§ 314.125 Refusal to approve an NDA.
(a) The Food and Drug Administration will refuse to approve the NDA and for a new drug give the applicant written notice of an opportunity for a hearing under § 314.200 on the question of whether there are grounds for denying approval of the NDA under section 505(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and CoRead full regulation →
- 21CFR314.105§ 314.105 Approval of an NDA and an ANDA.
(a) FDA will approve an NDA and send the applicant an approval letter if none of the reasons in § 314.125 for refusing to approve the NDA applies. FDA will issue a tentative approval letter if an NDA otherwise meets the requirements for approval under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, but caRead full regulation →
Enforcement Impact
Deficiencies cited in Warning Letters referencing the same regulations
Recent Cases
- 2025-09-09
Clinical Investigator
Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.
- 2025-07-15
Clinical Investigator
Mark J. Savant, M.D
- 2025-05-20
Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)
United Health Products, Inc.
- 2025-03-25
Clinical Investigator
Americo F. Padilla, M.D.
- 2024-11-05
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Armstrong County Memorial Hospital
Related Warning Letters (10)
- 2025-09-09
Clinical Investigator
Shirish M. Gadgeel, M.D.
- 2025-07-15
Clinical Investigator
Mark J. Savant, M.D
- 2025-05-20
Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)
United Health Products, Inc.
- 2025-03-25
Clinical Investigator
Americo F. Padilla, M.D.
- 2024-11-05
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Armstrong County Memorial Hospital
- 2024-10-22
Clinical Investigator
Namita A. Goyal, M.D.
- 2024-10-08
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Louisiana State University Health Science Center IRB
- 2024-07-16
Bioresearch Monitoring Program/IRB
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
- 2024-03-26
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
New York State Psychiatric Institute IRB
- 2023-06-06
Investigational Device Exemptions (Clinical Investigator)
Mobeen Mazhar, M.D.
Related MFDS Guidelines
Korean regulatory guidelines covering similar topics
See Also (8)
- Influenza: Developing Drugs for Treatment and/or Prophylaxis (Status: Final)
- Antibacterial Therapies for Patients With an Unmet Medical Need for the Treatment of Serious Bacterial Diseases (Status: Final)
- Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of PDUFA Products (Status: Draft)
- Antibacterial Therapies for Patients With an Unmet Medical Need for the Treatment of Serious Bacterial Diseases – Questions and Answers: Guidance for Industry (Status: Final)
- Dental Composite Resin Devices - Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions: Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (Status: Draft)
- Sponsor - Investigator - IRB Interrelationship: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators (Status: Final)
- Non-local IRB Review : Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators (Status: Final)
- Institutional Review Boards Frequently Asked Questions: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators (Status: Final)