Back to Explorer

PET Drug Products - Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP)

FinalCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research12/10/2009
Installation QualificationEnvironmental monitoringData IntegrityProcess VerificationPerformance QualificationOperational QualificationCurrent Good Manufacturing PracticeQuality Assurance

Description

This guidance is intended to help positron emission tomography (PET) drug producers better understand FDA’s thinking concerning compliance with the current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations. The guidance addresses resources, procedures, and documentation for all PET drug production facilities, academic and commercial. In some cases, the guidance provides practical examples of methods or procedures that PET drug production facilities can use to comply with the CGMP requirements.

Key Topics

Terms and concepts identified from this document

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

1
PET Drug Products

Guidance focuses on oversight of positron emission tomography drugs; Positron Emission Tomography drugs subject to specific ANDA policies; Regulatory scenarios for PET NDA and ANDA submissions

Stakeholders

6
PET drug producers

Entities responsible for compliance with CGMP regulations.

Designated individual

reviews laboratory testing and batch records for release

Operator

Person whose actions may cause a product to be deemed adulterated

Vendor

outsourced operation provider

Authorized Personnel

Individuals with access to label storage or signing certificates

Radioactive Drug Research Committee

committee that approves human research using radioactive drugs

Regulatory Context

Regulatory Activities

4
NDA

New Drug Application

Parametric release

Regulatory pathway for terminal sterilization without sterility testing

ANDA

Abbreviated New Drug Application

IND

Investigational New Drug submissions

Document Types

10
Master Production and Control Records

Standardized records for manufacturing processes; must be prepared, dated, and signed to assure uniformity

Complaint Files

Records of written and oral complaints

Distribution Records

Records maintained to facilitate location of recalled products

Annual Report

Reporting category for minor changes like removing a color additive

Batch Production Record

Records documenting the manufacturing of a batch

Batch Production and Control Record

Created for each new batch to document production and testing

Master Production and Control Record

Electronic workflow requiring validation

Certificate of Analysis

Document indicating analytical results of testing; record relied on to control L. monocytogenes in ingredients; document provided for a food prior to or upon receipt of the food; COA documentation

Production Batch Records

Reviewed for accuracy and completeness before final release.

Batch Production and Control Records

Records documenting the production of a specific batch; must be prepared for each batch of medical gas produced

Attributes

5
Personnel Qualifications

Requirements for staff involved in PET drug production.

Radiochemical purity

Should be approximately 95% to minimize artifactual results.

Expiration dates

Required record element for investigational product management.

Sterility

Requirement for devices provided sterile or non-sterile

Quarantined

Labeling status for incoming materials before release

Technical Details

Substances

6
Sterile PET Drug Products

The final product form requiring specific microbiological controls.

Water for Injection

used for final rinses in depyrogenation by washing

Ammonia N 13

Active ingredient in the proposed generic and RLD

FDG F 18

Example of a PET drug where finished-product testing ensures correct components; Example of a PET drug where identity is established during finished-product testing; every batch undergoes full finished-product testing (e.g., FDG F 18); example of PET drug where kryptofix may be a specific impurity

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

examples of such components include but are not limited to the active moiety (API)

70 Percent Isopropyl Alcohol

Wipe with an appropriate disinfectant such as sterile 70 percent isopropyl alcohol.

Testing Methods

10
Stability Testing

Testing used to justify leveraging data across products

QC test

Quality control testing performed prior to final labeling

Periodic quality indicator test

PQIT is a noncritical test performed in addition to specification tests

Stability-indicating methods

Methods that can distinguish degradation products and impurities

System suitability test

Used to verify that the measurement system and analytical operations are fit for purpose.

GC

Gas Chromatography used for impurities or assay.

HPLC

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography used for impurities or assay.

Bubble-point test

validated filter integrity test

Integrity testing

Integrity testing of membrane filters should always be performed postfiltration

Media fills

Failure to conduct media fills that closely simulate aseptic production operations

Processes

8
Aseptic Processing

implied manufacturing process under QS regulation

Reprocessing

End-user sterilization validation

Aseptic techniques

Required for parenteral interventions and biopsies.

Depyrogenation

Sterilization and depyrogenation validation; Changes in vial sterilization or depyrogenation method

Sterilizing Filtration

Microbiological control process for PET drugs; Part of the synthesis and purification of PET drugs; drug is considered to be nonsterile until it is passed through a sterilizing grade filter

Sterilization

Required for contaminated equipment and media before disposal

Stability Testing

Primary process described in the guideline; Core activity described in the guidance; General process for evaluating product quality over time; Formal stability studies to assess adjuvant stability; Evaluation of attributes at all storage conditions; The process of evaluating product quality over time under specified conditions.; Evaluation of product quality over time

Terminal Sterilization

Sterilization method for drug products

Clinical Concepts

1
Adverse reactions

Increased risk when daily wear lenses are worn overnight

Identified Hazards

Hazards

6
Microbiological Contamination

Environmental factors affecting biological products

Radiolysis

radiation-related stability concern for PET drugs

Pyrogen contamination

risk in transfer lines and resin columns

Microbial contamination

risk in multidose drug products

Bacterial Endotoxins

Risk addressed by pyrogenicity testing

Cross-Contamination

automated liquid handling systems can pose a risk of contamination within or between test runs

Standards & References

External Standards

10
USP <1225>

Validation of Compendial Procedures

USP <1015>

Automated Radiochemical Synthesis Apparatus

USP <85>

Endotoxin should be assessed following USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test.

USP <71>

Sterility testing may be performed in accordance with USP <71>.

USP <823>

Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography — Compounding

USP <1>

United States Pharmacopeia standard for Injections.

USP General Chapter <85>

Bacterial endotoxins testing standard; Endotoxin limits for subcutaneous administration

USP General Chapter <71>

Sterility Tests

USP General Chapter <1225>

Validation of Compendial Procedures

USP

United States Pharmacopeia standards for compendial drug substances; confirming conformance to the application-approved specification and USP

Specifications

3
Acceptance Criteria

limits for solid state form and particle size; Tightening acceptance criteria; Numerical limits or ranges for tests

Compliance with specifications

Review of complaints to determine if product met specifications

Radiochemical Yield

The minimum percentage of yield requiring investigation if not met.

ICH References (1)

ICH Q2A

Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures

Related CFR Sections (17)

Enforcement Impact

Deficiencies cited in Warning Letters referencing the same regulations

Quality control unit failed to exercise its responsibility
101
Failure to conduct at least one test to verify the identity of each component
95
Failure to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control
88
Failure to thoroughly investigate any unexplained discrepancy or failure of a batch
56
Failure to have appropriate laboratory determination of satisfactory conformance to final specifications
56
Failure to establish an adequate quality control unit
49
Failure to test samples of each component for identity and conformity
47
Failure to establish laboratory controls
35
Failure to thoroughly investigate any unexplained discrepancy
28
Failure to test samples of each component for identity
25

Related Warning Letters (10)

Related MFDS Guidelines

Korean regulatory guidelines covering similar topics

See Also (8)