Back to Explorer

Patient Preference Information - Voluntary Submission, Review in Premarket Approval Applications, Humanitarian Device Exemption Applications, and De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Decision Summaries and Device Labeling: Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders

FinalCenter for Devices and Radiological Health Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research08/24/2016

Description

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) values the experience and perspectives of patients. The Agency understands that patients and care-partners who live with a disease or condition on a daily basis and utilize devices in their care may have developed their own insights into and perspectives on the benefits and risks of devices reviewed under the premarket approval, humanitarian device exemption (HDE), orde novoclassification pathway. FDA believes that patients can and should bring their own experiences to bear in helping the Agency evaluate the benefit-risk profile of certain devices.

Scope & Applicability

Product Classes

4
Weight Loss Devices

Example study regarding CDRH patient preferences

Humanitarian Use Device

Medical device intended for small populations

Class II Device

Devices subject to section 522 postmarket surveillance orders; devices subject to postmarket surveillance orders

Class III Device

Generally recommended for Enhanced Documentation; Regulatory classification mentioned for implantable sensors and HPV tests; Mentioned in the context of an in vitro nucleic acid test for CMV DNA.

Stakeholders

5
Sponsors

Assist sponsors in the nonclinical evaluation

Sponsor

Entity responsible for submitting applications under section 524B

Investigator

Responsible for qualifications, training, and trial conduct; Individual responsible for trial conduct and data governance at a site.; May delegate tasks but retains overall responsibility; Person responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at a trial site; Responsible for trial conduct and participant safety; Responsible for trial conduct, data integrity, and investigational product management.; Individual responsible for trial conduct at a site and informing the institution.; maintaining

Care-partners

Individuals such as parents whose preferences may be considered; involved in early stage qualitative discussions

Healthcare Professionals

Users whose characteristics impact user needs and communication format.; Intended users of the AI-enabled device; Intended User: Healthcare professionals

Regulatory Context

Attributes

6
Benefit-Risk Profile

The overall evaluation of a product's benefits versus its risks

Minimum Clinically Meaningful Benefit

PPI can be used to help define the minimum clinically meaningful benefit

Benefit-Risk Tradeoff

Inclusion of PPI in FDA's public decision summaries can be helpful to healthcare professionals and patients in making healthcare decisions involving difficult benefit-risk tradeoffs.

BMI

Body Mass Index used for weight classification and estimating adiposity

Valid Scientific Evidence

Standard for data supporting an HDE

Patient Preference Information

Assessments of the relative desirability to patients of specified alternatives.

Identified Hazards

Hazards

1
Cognitive Bias

Study design should minimize framing, anchoring, and ordering effects

Related CFR Sections (6)

Related Warning Letters (6)

  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/Institutional Review Board (IRB)

    United Health Products, Inc.

    2025-05-20
  • Bioresearch Monitoring Program/IRB

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT

    2024-07-16
  • Investigational Review Board (IRB)

    Nobles Medical Technology II, Inc.

    2024-03-12
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Misbranded

    Wello Inc.

    2023-11-14
  • CGMP/QSR/Medical Devices/Adulterated

    Synovo Production, Inc.

    2023-04-04
  • Investigational Device Exemptions (Clinical Investigator)

    Kennedy, Philip R.

    2020-04-07

See Also (8)